Sunday, January 31, 2016

Experience as Person

Ryne Morse
ID-162-001
31 January 2016
Experience as Person
            I attended the noon mass at Christ Cathedral Church in Lexington on Sunday, January 31st. Unfortunately it is hard for me to be impressed by the interior of the cathedral, since just this past summer I had the privilege of experiencing places like il Duomo in Milan, St. Peter’s Basilica in Vatican City, and also the Sistine Chapel. However, my first impressions of the interior of their sanctuary were quite positive. Honestly, immediately I noticed that the elegant backdrop to the preaching clergy littered with pipe organs flaring everywhere, colorful depictions in stain-glass windows, and the decorative domed ceiling that focuses your attention even more on the middle of the stage, are far more impressive than any design in the Sistine Chapel itself (with the exception of the ceiling, of course.) Casually lit by random, chain-suspended medieval-looking chandeliers throughout the room, one massive chandelier that hangs over the stage almost out of sight to the normal people, and also naturally through the beautifully depicted stain-glass windows, brightness is an important factor in a church mass to symbolize hope and love, and also to enlighten people’s morning.
            On the other hand, while attending the “Shaping Space” dance concert in Guignol Theatre on January 29th, many different impressions are given off. I have never been a huge fan of interpretive dance and theatre, as I find it very hard sometimes to come across the underlying theme or message. I think of it similarly to complex literature. Although I do pride myself on being able to fully understand a complex piece of literature despite all of the other fluff they throw onto the pages, I find it frustrating with dance since it seems like they are trying to relay a message to me throughout the whole dance and I am just not getting it. I almost left the theatre just as confused as I walked in. I would like to note that this is not a critique on the play itself, as I thought the performers did an excellent job executing their routines, but it almost seems like I am watching a movie in Russian. Despite that fact, I was able to point out some similarities and differences from the church service.  

            It is easy to notice right off the bat how one is to occupy each space. Giognol is nevertheless set up the way a normal theatre would be; a massive stage centered at the front with about 20 rows of chairs spread among three columns. There is no restriction on whom to sit with at this event, and in fact, as long as you are respectful, it is encouraged to discuss the scenes of the play with a friend or neighbor. This helped me ample amounts, as many other people saw what was going on better than I. As for Christ Church, church pews line the audience of the sanctuary, perfectly straight and uniform, much like the way of life for a die-hard believer, with walkways in between. However, unlike a social event where one would tend to sit with a friend or someone to make the time go by quicker, here in the church, it is almost taboo to not sit with your family. This is for a variety of reasons. One, religious teachings constantly express the importance of family and love, so it would only make since that you sit with your family in a time of prayer and Sabbath. Two, if one were to sit with a close friend, that would entail you to talk to them and be social. Another taboo of the church, do not talk while the Priest is talking. It is extremely disrespectful to be disruptive and social during church, much like school. However, unlike school where the no talking rule is purely so students may listen and understand material, in church it is “common knowledge” growing up to churchgoers that mass is a place of quiet worship out of pure respect. Going back to the earlier topic of the design of the space, this also makes it very easy to tell which spaces are supposed to be occupied by. For example: the church pews occupy the lowest level of the building with very high ceilings. This symbolizes to the people to always remember that you are below a higher power, far below. As we move to the front, we see that the massive, decorated stage in which the clergy preach from is approximately 5 feet higher that the pews filled with normal people, and over their heads resides a massive dome reaching further into the sky than any other part of the building. This symbolizes that the clergymen are just that much closer to the higher power than the people, and the dome represent that this higher power and the clergy have a direct source of communication through each other. This also touches on the scale of the space. Pretty much any church you go into nowadays, you will notice a very large inside with ceilings reaching as far as their budgets will let them. This is so once again; the people will feel small in the house of God, and maybe even in the presence of him.

Case Study 6




Ryne Morse
ID 162-001
28 January 2016
Case Study 6 – Chemosphere
            For this analysis, I will be conducting as if I was a casual dinner guest in the Chemosphere house. Upon arrival, as I start climbing the deck that carries you the last 20 feet or so of elevation from the driveway to the front door, one that architect of the house John Lautner dubbed the “hillavator,” I immediately notice the terrace that possibly will give you the best view in all of Los Angeles, and the full-wall fixed glass windows that make artificial lighting in the kitchen, living and dining rooms during the daytime unnecessary. I also notice that there are eight walls total in the octagon-shaped house, four of which have pan windows for walls to symbolize the more public and open area of the house. This section of the house also happens to be orientated toward the city of Los Angeles, mainly to give a breathtaking view but also symbolism of the welcoming feel to the public section of the home. Like I mentioned earlier, this section of the house includes the kitchen, living room, and dining room; the three main areas where guests will spend time. On the other hand, the four opposite walls are not see through by any means, and are tucked away from the city at the rear of the house. This includes bedrooms, bathrooms, and things usually for permanent residents or trusted company only. A very interesting yet basic design choice by John Lautner.
Getting back to my visit, I enter in to the right, around the bar and into the open dining/living space. Although the house as a hole does not pack a whole lot of square footage, the fact that there are no walls diving these rooms, and only a sitting bar partially separating the kitchen from it, it seems much larger than in actually is. The full sized windows and the large, sectional couch lining the semi-circle-shaped inside wall add to this effect quite a bit as well. With the combination of a not too large but adequate dinette set, and utilizing the sectional couches to line the walls instead of placing a sofa out in the middle of the room, Lautner really packed as much luxury and efficiency into a rather small design as he could. All in all it is a quite brilliant set-up. It is easy to get lost in the view from the dining table and the petite sitting area planted right in the middle of the house; you almost forget you have basically been in the same room the whole time. The futuristic, UFO-shaped design of the house will bring out the kid in anyone, and immediately put a smile on your face.